PLC: Implementation Roadmap
Transcript: Evaluation Methods References DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., and Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. DuFour, R., Eaker, R., and DuFour R. (2005). On common ground: A power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. Roberts, S. and Pruitt, E. (2009). Schools as professional learning communnities: Collaborative activities and strategies for professional development. San Juan Schools. (2011). Professional learning communities: A focus on student learning. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36:tuaailm4 Term: 3-5 Yrs Turning Data into Information The Strategic Planninng Committee (SPC) which is comprised of the committee chairs will assess the current strategic plan for relevancy and alignment with desired outcomes The SPC will determine what components of the plan to keep or drop The SPC will also determine if new components need to be created The SPC will also assess the feasibiity of the Strategic Plan The revised plan will include smart goals which will drive the work of each committee towards committee goals Term: 2 Yrs . Term: 1 Yr Pre-Assessments. Mid-Year Assessments. Post Assessments. Evaluations. Rubrics Implementation Roadmap Using School Improvement Goals to Drive Team Goals . Ensure mutual understanding that the chief duty of a board member is resource development. Implement a board member agreement to build accountability. Effective Communication . Committees will define their purpose within the context of the organization Committees will coordinate and advance corresponding focus areas for the organization Committees will make data-based recommendations to the full board Clearly Defined Outcomes Board President and Administration Intervention Strategies . Term: 6 Mos - 1 Yr Board President, Committe Chairs and Administration Director and Committee Chairs Board and Staff Professional Learning Community Term: 9 Mos Laying the Foundation Director and Committee Chairs The full board will discuss and review the Quality Assurance report data from the previous year and the new report expectations Committees will focus on certain components of the report to determine how to use the data to improve the organization's performance in a certain area Committees will use the data to develop strategies for improvement Board and Staff Monitoring Each Student's Learning Response to Intervention Model The full board will review existing norms, make adjustments where needed, and adhere to the norms The full board will develop norms for addressing conflicts The full board will develop norms for addressing lack of participation The full board will develop norms for maintaining good communication Committeess will analyze relevant data from the previous quality assurance report Committees will identify deficiencies and areas that need improvement Committee chairs will collaborate to develop a comprehensive plan to improve quality assurance scores Term: 6 Mos Board and Staff Term: 1 Yr Note: This presentation will subsitute student learning for committee learning and engagement. DuFour Professional Learning Community Model Strengthen knowledge and understanding of board member expectations Redefine the role of board members to meet organizational needs Provide intense board training Align committee functions with desired outcomes Develop and adopt resource development strategies Develop a sustainability plan Term: 1 Yr Board President and Committee Chairs Systematic Intervention Building a Collaborative Culture
Prezi Present
Prezi Video
Prezi Design
