Shell
Transcript: 1907- 2007: Royal Dutch Shell Centenary Oil and gas Exploration and Production 4th ranked 4Q 2011 by market capitalization (2002) 10th 189,913 million - (2011) 4th 236,766 million +25% (Financial Times,2012) BP (2002) 8th 200,794m, - (2011) 34th 135,803m -33% (Financial Times,2012) New technologies and techniques for successful business. The technology for detecting and tracking spilled oil in the Arctic Shell has been training a dachshund and two border collies to detect oil spills beneath snow and ice (Guardian, 2012) Reasons: The globalization of the company and its processes Competitor has more resources, easy to control resources. How: implementing four major portal projects for Enterprise Portal 1. GeoPortal: Improve information sharing and collaboration between the specialists working on the system 2. EP-One Portal: Document management, and discussion forum for efficient collaboration. 3. Facility Services: Wide range of services 4. Wells Portal: Managing the delivery and maintenance of oil and gas well risk Cost is bit higher Security problem It needs to be organized (Vyom, 2010) Royal Dutch Shell Cost reduction Productivitiy improvement Less fear of turnover of people Maximize efficiency Shell Exploration and Production 6155103 Access to library anywhere Information collected not only paper-based, but also digital More convenient to users EP-ONE Weakness Xinyuan Fan(Zoe) The Site Service Rijswijk The meeting Service 6491553 Email system Facility management system Catering system Travel management system Few steps Few errors Satisfied feedback More site users Withdrawal data from system and via to an easy to use and conventional web-browser as an easy Improve efficiency and effectiveness of UK public sector. Thank you for your attention! Standardize business processes EP-Online knowledge environment Connect staff with everyone they need(Pienaar, 2003) Conclusion Daniel, E. & Ward, J. (2006) Integrated service delivery Exploratory case studies of enterprise portal adoption in UK local government, Business Process Management Journal , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 113-123. Financial Times (2002) FT Global 500 2002 by market values, http://specials.ft.com/spdocs/FT3BNS7BW0D.pdf (accessed on 18/03/2012). Financial Times (2012) FT Global 500 December 2011 by prices and market values, http://media.ft.com/cms/73f82726-385d-11e1-9f07-00144feabdc0.pdf (accessed on 18/03/2012). Goldenberg, S. (2012) Dogs take lead in sniffing out Arctic oil, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/mar/12/oil-arctic-shell-dogs?INTCMP=SRCH (Accessed on 21/03/2012). Jelassi, T. & Enders, A. (2008) Strategies for e-Business. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd. Pienaar, H. (2003) Design and Development of an Academic Portal, Libri, vol. 53, pp. 118–129. Vyom (2010) Advantages and Disadvantages of intranet portal. [online] Available at: http://vyom.articlealley.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-intranet-portal-1601016.html (accessed on 20/03/2012). 4451902 Difficult to interact with the existing business application Difficult for interactive communication ( can be one way communication) references Disadvantages Disadvantages compare with competitors in Middle East countries. Benefits Integrate existing service and administrative system Integrate internal business application with external partner organization Benifits for companies 6329004 Yusung Kim (ian) Project facility services Introduction Benifits for users Yueyang Wang(Bryan) Yue Li(Lari) Research and Development EP-ONE Portal Enterprise Portal of UK Government